Is “The Curse of Oak Island” The Reality Show We Deserve?

Video here, text transcript below.


Follow up video: Why Is The Curse of Oak Island Lying To Us?

There are now three realms of existence: reality, fiction, and reality TV. Reality TV is far too contrived to be reality, which is probably why the TV networks prefer the term “non-scripted TV.” The genre fails in comparison to reality. Nevertheless, locking people in houses, stranding them on islands, stalking hillbillies, and raiding abandoned storage lockers are now staples of basic cable reality TV.

Then there’s Oak Island. It’s a real place with a real history, not an island turned into a TV set with scripted “non-scripted” drama. But Oak Island the place is different from “The Curse of Oak Island” the TV show. How different is the question and is “The Curse of Oak Island” the reality show we deserve is a second question.

Last year, I wrote an article about what the Oak Island mystery reveals about human loves and fascinations. It is one of my most read articles, probably by people hoping for gossip more than philosophical insights, but there you have it. This year, I want to explore the connection between this “reality show” and us humans—what people want and what people get.

We humans are curious beings. We love a story and learning new things (well, most of us do). Whether one prefers fictional or reality-based stories is a matter of personal taste. “The Curse of Oak Island” is a reality TV show. It is not a documentary. The network can legitimately call it “non-scripted” but that doesn’t mean the action isn’t staged before the act or edited after the act.

A Question of What’s Real
What’s real and what’s not in “The Curse of Oak Island?” The Lagina brothers and their colleagues on the search are all real people. They aren’t actors. The basic story of the Laginas searching for an answer to the Oak Island mystery is real. They’d be searching for information whether or not there was a camera crew following them around. The people are real and the quest is real.

That said, we have no way of comparing what the show’s producers are showing us with what really happens on the island. We see only the finished, and highly edited, product made for television. All indications are that the producers think of the show as entertainment, not as a chronicle of events. There’s nothing inherently wrong with taking that approach, of course, but it does lead to the question of whether the audience is being treated fairly and with respect. How much doctoring is going on?

What Stands Between Us and Reality?
“The Curse of Oak Island” is a reality TV show, but it’s different. There’s a real mystery here, not just how much will the pawnbroker pay for that old item. But the idea that the search to solve the mystery should be shown as entertainment is problematic. For example, I teach philosophy for a living, and I see what bad things can happen when others care more about making philosophy entertaining than being accurate about philosophy. The more you lean toward entertainment, the more you’re willing to fudge facts to get there. That’s going on with Oak Island, the TV show.

I don’t doubt that Gary Drayton really does find “bobby dazzlers” on Oak Island, and other finds are legit, but the circumstances surrounding these discoveries can be reasonably doubted. That’s because “The Curse of Oak Island” is produced by an entertainment company, Prometheus Entertainment. It should be pointed out that Prometheus Entertainment’s other productions include the severely and often laughingly inaccurate “Ancient Aliens” and multiple shows about the Playboy Mansion. They produce reality TV entertainment. I’m sure they’re good people but their track record indicates that historical documentation isn’t high on their agenda.

Prometheus Entertainment stands between us and what’s really happening on the island. I’m not making them out to be the bad guys, just pointing out that fact. TV is a business and the network is about making money on advertising and that means courting viewers with sensationalism. And History Channel, which has very little to do with history, wants sensationalism. Could it be…. yes, Prometheus Entertainment provides that sensationalism. The editing, the scene staging, the lack of continuity, the withholding of information to create fake drama, that’s reality TV, not reality.

Unless those who actually do the searching speak out, we can only see Oak Island through the filter that Prometheus Entertainment places over the camera lens. The Laginas are private people. Do a Web search for yourself. You will find almost nothing about them. That’s their right. It’s doubtful they will say anything publicly, as is their right. They seem to be putting up with the excesses of the producers and network to have the opportunity to fulfill their dream of solving the Oak Island mystery. Those millions of dollars have to come from somewhere and Billy, Laird, Terry, Gary, Mike, and Vanessa don’t come cheap.

The problem is that people can tell there’s a gap between reality and what the entertainment company shows. Too many poor edits, too many staged scenes, way too much filler, and way too much repetition, and way too much repetition, and…you get the idea, give it away that there are lies of omission. Gaps in a story create the problem of baseless speculation. If people aren’t given a straight answer, they will create one for themselves. The problem is worse for Oak Island because there are so many crackpot theories out there for people to choose from. For every fact about the Oak Island mystery there are dozens of tall tales if not outright lies. We all deserve better.

The Audience as Consumer
It’s interesting, when you think about it, how we consider the rights of the consumer in almost every product except television. Maybe we assume that people should just change the channel, or maybe the expectations for TV are so low that we don’t consider quality to be much of an issue. Much of what is on TV is of poor quality—shows rushing to the lowest common denominator. Reality TV is by far the worst in this area. I need only say “Snookie” and “Honey Boo Boo.”

The Laginas and their Fellowship of the Dig are not the cast of a normal reality TV show. For that, we should thank them. Because of them, “The Curse of Oak Island” has an integrity and class seldom seen in reality TV. We should also thank the Laginas and colleagues for sharing their quest with us. The Laginas deserve the gratitude of those who have been following their quest, but what do those who have been following the show deserve? They deserve an even better show, one with a bit more reality and a little less TV.


  1. My friends make fun of me, the show, me watching the show & of course the show being made in the 1st place. I nearly was hook line & sunk when my mates caught me watching the new reality show named something like ” Lost Relics of the Knights Templer!!!!!!!.”
    Where’s David Attenborough’s shows when you need to give yourself a reality check? Lol

  2. I’ve watched the show from the very 1st season. It’s gotten so repetitive I’ve now fast-forward through all but about 10 minutes of the show. I hate what the show has evolved into but love the history of the island so I continue to record and fast-forward for those every so small amounts of interesting new information. In my opinion this is the worst produced show on the history Channel.

    1. I am also a bit tired of the repetition, but I will take Oak Island over pawn shops and hunting alligators.

      1. I think the problem is people are missing what this is about. It’s about the lure of treasure, the search for mystery and human behaviour. I watched the first 5 series looking for doubt in the minds of the expedition. But one episode Marty said it’s about finding the truth.
        This is about partnership, family, knowing the truth and working a stunning project.

        Some thoughts:
        Any treasure is a bonus.
        Wouldn’t it be a great way to live in the time we have left solving mystery’s and hunting through history and an island.
        When do you say ‘that’s it, I’m done’?
        Is life really about searching, or finding, big treasure chests.

        1. I totally agree. I am at times frustrated that the producers of the show feel the need to force the entertainment factor, or what they think is entertainment, when the mystery and the quest to solve it should be all the interest they need.

  3. I have never seen so much horse shit in my life, I have tried to watch but from all the “amazing finds” that don’t mean anything, I’ve found better at the bottom of the garden! It must have cost millions to put this prog on air- what for? Donate to something important like converting a mad Russian bear into TEDDy Bear. DONATE to the UKRAINIAN people who actually need support . Something that is worthwhile and worth spending millions of pounds on.

  4. Great question. If the other shows go on like this show with no treasure… I wouldn’t be surprised people give up on them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.