Sorry, Veganism Won’t Save the Planet

Too Lazy; Didn’t Read (TL;DR): Veganism won’t save the planet because it attacks the wrong targets.

I recently saw someone describe herself as a “vegan evangelist.” Strange though that label may sound, it appropriately describes the religious fervor of veganism. She said, as do some others, that she was on a mission to “save the planet” and wants to convert people to veganism.

To “go vegan” is a legitimate dietary choice, but I am about to become a heretic in the vegan evangelists’ eyes, because I will dare to question the vegan dogma. There are multiple fallacies in the vegan ideology but for brevity, in this article, I will concentrate on the “veganism will save the planet” claim. It’s about the climate crisis.

Correct Problem, Wrong Solution

The Earth’s climate is changing, and we humans are causing it. We need to change our way of life before we extinguish the planet’s ecosystem and us with it.

The vegan evangelists claim that growing meat is a leading, and some claim the primary,  cause of climate change. Declaring that we all need to go vegan to save the planet has the appeal of a simple solution. But it is ultimately a false hope that distracts us from real solutions.

A leading cause of climate change is greenhouse gas (carbon) emissions—carbon dioxide, methane, and the like. Vegan evangelists blame animal agriculture for this. Their accusations run from the absurd (cow belches and farts) to the insightful objection to how we are using the land to grow food.

Land use is a very important issue. What are the most efficient ways to use land to grow food? By efficient, I don’t mean a corporatist calculation of how to extract the most profits per hectare from agricultural land. I mean how we can grow enough food to feed people without harming the environment through spreading toxins and excess carbon emissions.


The vegan evangelists’ mistake is dogmatically clinging to their simple solution and not looking at all of the evidence. Cherry picking data and confirmation bias are very common, and in no way unique to vegans. Vegan evangelists are responsible for believing false narratives that attack the wrong targets.

Dr. Sarah Taber, a scientist specializing in food production, schooled a vegan evangelist in this highly informative Twitter lecture. Do please read that thread; I won’t repeat Dr. Taber’s many excellent, factual points debunking veganism’s false narratives about land use. The vegan’s only response was to block Dr. Taber and the facts she presented—the type of response common to zealots. Can’t deal with the facts? Then block people telling them and run away to hide in your silo.

The facts are that human behavior is causing climate change and we have created a climate crisis, but eating meat is not causing it and veganism will not stop it. Veganism is the wrong solution that tries to make an overly simple ideology a panacea.

If you want to save the planet you need to a LOT more than give up hamburgers. You have to change not only your diet but all of society. Giving up meat has little effect in stopping climate change if everything else in the modern world continues.

The Real Culprit

Your plant-based diet won’t help the planet if those plants are:

  • Grown with herbicides and pesticides
  • Grown with artificial fertilizers
  • Planted and harvested using fossil fuel-burning machinery
  • Grown, harvested, and processed using exploitative labor
  • Transported to you by fossil fuel-burning machinery
  • Stored or sold in settings that consume non-sustainable energy

The inconvenient truth is that our patriarchal, corporatist socio-economic system is destroying the planet. Eating meat did not create that system (if you want a single cause to blame, look into the history of wheat cultivation). Veganism does not address much less solve the underlying problem.

Concerning excess greenhouse gasses, the issue is not cattle farting, it’s actions like taking fruit from the tropics and flying them to other continents. It’s a vegan driving an SUV to a specialty vegan store. It’s the single-use plastics that serve the vegan bubble teas and package the vegan fake meat products.

If the vegan evangelist says, “but I cut down on my use of single-use plastics, and I drive an electric car, and I recycle,” I say, that’s good. Seriously, kudos. But guess what? A meat-eater can do all of those acts too, and in fact, many do.

I completely agree with vegan evangelists when they argue that the methods used by agriculture to grow meat is overly wasteful and harms the environment. Here’s the reality beneath the rhetoric: Meat is NOT the problem; it is the way meat is grown that is the problem.


Here’s an analogy to explain it. Trees produce wood, right? To make wood products, we need to cut down trees. Indiscriminate clear-cutting of forests harms the environment, but trees can be sustainably grown and harvested. Trees are the epitome of a renewable resource if we work with nature. The patriarchal, corporatist mindset of bringing the big trucks into the forest, cutting down all the trees, and hauling it away, harms the planet. The mindset that the forest is there to be exploited for profit is the culprit.

The agricultural equivalent of indiscriminate clear-cutting of forests is factory farming. The patriarchal, corporatist mindset that land is there to be exploited for profit regardless of the consequences is the chief culprit causing climate change. Factory farming focuses on economies of scale. The corporate push for economic efficiency leads to the use of monoculture, herbicides and pesticides, artificial fertilizers, and fossil fuel-burning machinery.

Especially in the last fifty years, factory farming corporations have created enormous farms in selected areas, dominating land and water supplies, and forcing the food system to rely on transporting food hundreds, even thousands, of kilometers from the factory farms to the consumers. Nearly 70% of U.S. total fruit and vegetable production comes from California (only 4% of it grown organically) and has to be transported around the country. That’s factory farming of fruits and vegetables, not meat, with all of the related harms caused by fossil-fuel burning transport vehicles.

Here’s the thing. Factory farming is used to grow all food, not just meat. Whether it’s pigs or corn, if you use toxic chemicals and fossil fuels to grow them, you are harming the planet with poisons, waste, and greenhouse gas pollution. The issue is the processes that are used to produce foods not the foods themselves.

The vegan evangelists will respond to these facts, often quite testily as they did with Dr. Taber, with their cherry-picked data about this or that pork or poultry farm producing pollution, but ignore the data about plant-based agriculture producing pollution.

Can we grow plant-based foods without harming the environment? Yes, and we should.

Can we grow meat-based foods without harming the environment? Yes, and we should.

There are many farmers who grow meat responsibly and sustainably. Many of those farmers also grow fruit and vegetables responsibly and sustainably. They are small-scale farmers who sell their food at local farmers’ markets and grocery stores. Many of those farms have been family-owned for generations.

Vegan evangelists can hate on these small meat-growing farmers all they like, but the bottom line is that factory farming is the culprit and if we remove factory farming of food, we save the planet. We do not need to reduce our dairy and meat intake; we need to buy local rather than importing our food from far-away factory farms. No veganism required.

Should some people eat more fruit and veg? Yes. Does that mean meat should be forbidden for everyone? Of course not.

In short, if you want to save the planet, buy local. Local farmers can produce meat and other animal products ethically and sustainably. Your factory-farmed vegetables, your avocados and other tropical “superfoods” flown in for your privileged consumption are far more harmful to the planet than Farmer Jones’s organic beef and cheese grown a few kilometers from you.

So, stop attacking the wrong targets.

Hard data on this: Population, livestock farming and damn emissions disputes.

8 comments

  1. An excellent article. Humans invented ‘mixed farming’ to grow food in a natural balance. The animals and poultry give meat and dairy, their fertiliser grows the grain fruit and vegetables. Grazing animals give meat and fleece/skins and contribute to the management of land that’s unproductive for growing plant food. The by products of all this contribute to a vast number of products, from ink to glue, toothpaste to tools. The by products from just one pig is very long , here’s some of it: water filters, insulation, rubber, antifreeze, certain plastics, floor waxes, crayons, chalk, adhesives and fertilizer (USDA, 2016)shaving creams, soaps, make-up.

    I maintain that humans can survive on a vegan diet but can’t have robust health to support the immune system and brain health into a long and productive life.

    1. Thanks and thank you for mentioning those important facts. The claim that animal agriculture is wasteful is false propaganda. Veganism is a lifestyle choice, an affection, not an ethical or environmental solution.

  2. Thank you for your article. Here are some thoughts:

    “Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose.”

    Some vegans claim they save the world, but most of them know it’s not a perfect solution, as every lifestyle causes harm to the environment. However, veganism causes the least harm. Most vegans are extremely conscious about the environment: they buy organic vegetables and fruits, ride a bike, wear second-hand clothes, etc.

    If we tried to meet the demand for animal products from small-scale farmers, there would be a tremendous need for land. We’re already pushing it, as it is. Furthermore, grass-fed beef is not good for the environment, either. The meadows they graze on often consist solely of ryegrass, which doesn’t allow other flora to grow. Some would call them grass deserts, even. Also, even grass-fed cattle needs soy, grains and other animal feed, because they can’t graze in winter. Which still makes it an efficient way to produce food. And yes, I know, some parts of the plants we feed animals cannot be consumed by us.

    This article seems yet another excuse to keep consuming animal products. You can apply all your suggestions and still consume animal products, or apply all your suggestion and NOT consume animal products. The latter causes less pollution and harm. The reason is simple. We need more land, feed and water to raise cattle, than we need to grow plants. Why not opt for buying vegetables from local farmers? Wouldn’t that be a more logical conclusion?

    I do agree that some vegans should be more conscious about the plants they consume. It really doesn’t make sense to fly in bananas, when you can eat local organic apples and pears.

    1. “This article seems yet another excuse to keep consuming animal products.”
      There is no need to excuse it because there is absolutely nothing wrong with consuming animal products.

      The argument that “veganism causes the least harm” is not supported by scientific evidence. The land use argument for veganism is prima facie incorrect because the vast majority of land is unsuitable for fruit and vegetable product. It is wrong to cut down rain forest to grow anything–plants or animals. Those heinous acts, and the push for factory farming, come not from the need for food but the need for corporate profits. The solution, as I state in the article and video, is to change the way we produce ALL food from global corporatism back to regional production. Veganism ignores that solution and lends itself to corporatism, as we are seeing.

  3. An important message to get into the wild. I truly wish people would take it to heart but, alas, they won’t.

    1. Yes, it is too bad vegan ideologues will not look at scientific data or listen to rational arguments. We can’t save the planet by closing our eyes, ears, and minds.

    1. Thank you. Please share the article so we can generate more conversation about the real issues causing climate change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.